Wave particle duality states that sub atomic particles act as both waves and particles,
but only under certain conditions. The exact possition of an electron cannot be calculated along with the speed at which its moving. When observed and calculating the possition of the electron the electron is viewed as a particle that means that it must not have motion and is not moving. It must be frozen like a freeze frame or a photo meaning it must be frozen in time.
When the particles speed needs to be calculated the electron must be unfrozen meaning
it is allowed to move again and is observed as a wave. Which leads me to the fact that time is a wave and is responsible for the motion of all objects through time. The less mass an object has, the faster it moves through time. The more mass an object has the slower it moves through time. A particle of light has no mass, so it is pushed through time at the speed of time, not the speed of light.
When an object such as a very large star crosses the threshold were time can no longer
push it forward in time, it colapses in on itself and begins to travel backwards in time, hence, a black hole is created. All black holes are portals to the past, and all lead back to the beggining of time. Black holes also suck up the total mass of the universe making it lighter, and releaving pressure which allows time to push all matter faster through time, this is why our universe is expanding faster and faster.
The releaving of the pressure on all matter in the universe, due to the loss of mass, is also allowing atoms to expand, which is the reason why our planet has increased in size over the last 4 billion years but not much in mass.
Missing Mass Theories
Theory 1. I believe all matter that enters into a black hole is converted into anti-matter.
This anti-matter is all around us but cannot interact with us because its traveling backwards in time. This is where 95% of all the universe's mass has gone. when all the matter of our universe is converted into anti-matter at the end of time and finishes is journy back to the beggining of time, and all anti-matter is condensed into that pinpoint area it is then retransformed from anti-matter into matter. <this is only 1 theory, below is another
Theory 2. Since smaller particles move at shorter wavelengths then larger objects, we are actually observing the total mass of the universe as more then what it actually is. If tiny particles moving at accelerated rates are shared by more then 1 large object moving at longer wavelengths of time in space, then the mass of these objects would be shared as well. (Read note 10 below for more details)
Here are some of my notes.
1. The wave of time pushes objects through timespace at speeds in accordance
with the objects mass. The more massive an object is, the slower the object is
pushed through timespace. The less massive an object is, the faster the object
is pushed through timespace.
2. Light does not move at the speed of light, it moves it the speed of time.
3. Gravity is an outcome or result of the effect of mass on the time wave.
The time wave wavelength of an object is equal to its full gravitational reach.
4. When an object becomes so massive that the time wave is stretched to a straight
line, if any more mass is added, the time wave reverses and time begins to travel
backwards. This is the birth of a black hole.
All black holes are portals back through time to the beginning of our universe.
The singularities of all black holes are actually the very same singularity that was
present at the at the birth of the universe.
5. As an object loses mass it is pushed faster through timespace by the wave of time.
As the object is pushed faster the wavelength of time decreases and the object
begins to become more 2 dimensional. This is why the massless photon, as it moves
through time space, appears 2 dimensional.
Mass is what causes the 2 dimensional time wave to become 3 dimensional
through the stretching of its wavelength.
6. All matter that enters into a black hole is converted into anti-matter,
this is where most of the matter of our universe has gone.
As black holes suck up the mass of our universe and converts it into anti-matter,
our universe is becoming less massive allowing time to push objects and all matter
faster through timespace.
As black holes suck up the mass of our universe, pressure is being released
from objects allowing them to expand and grow in size but not in total mass.
7. To move an object "unnaturally" through timespace you need to exert energy,
the faster you want to go the more energy you need.
The faster an object is pushed through timespace by the time wave, the faster
time passes. The slower an object is pushed through timespace by the time wave,
the slower time passes.
Either way the object still feels and sees time as passing normally reguardless
of how fast time passes around it as time is relative to the observer.
8. The time wave is the folding of the next higher dimension, thus 3 dimensional time is
the folding of the forth dimension as time in the forth dimension would be the folding of
the fifth, and so on and so forth. This is why time is relitive to the observer. Once you
break the time barrier of a dimension by unfolding the next higher dimension, all effects
of time from the lower dimension have been nullified, but time still exists in the current
dimension due to the folding of the next higher dimension.
9. More mass flattens the time wave horizontally allowing you to see all timelines from all
dimensions. Less mass flattens the time wave vertically bringing
all timelines from third dimension together.
10. Every object in space has its own time wave. smaller objects can ride larger objects
time waves if the gravity of the larger object is strong enough to capture the smaller
object.
Smaller objects with smaller wavelengths will appear to exist in multiple places at the
same time inside the wavelength of a larger object. This is why the electron can exist in
two different places at the same time, because its smaller wavelegnth is allowing it to
travel faster through the larger wavelength.
This is also why i believe all matter in the universe is shared by different objects, thus
mars for example could be sharing some of the same high speed particles as earth.
particles of the past, present and future can exist at the same time in a larger object
wavelegnths.
11. The time wave, and fabric of space are opposites. The presence of mass opens the time wave, giving it a longer wave length, and closes space. The absence of mass opens the time wave, shortening its wavelength, and opens up space.
Im not a physicist, so I would love to see if anyone could come up with some mathematical formulas to add to my thoughts.
this can probably be added to messing with the suns rays with lenses to create large illusions on the sky OR tickle the temperature of the earth's core. theres this family that came from an ancient dynasty and knows about the secrets of the universe. what the fuk do i know, im just into animism
ReplyDeleteZoroastrianism. fuk da rest
Interesting post. I'm not a physicist either. You do have SOMETHING, I'm just not sure what it is that you have.
ReplyDeleteWhen Einstein first realized his theory of relativity he also did not have the math yet. You may have stumbled on the holy grail of physics theory. Go back to school. Get the math. Do it. The Holy Grail of Physics is the yet undiscovered theory that explains the interaction of all the forces; a unified field theory. Reread your theory; eureka man, I think you got it.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteUhm.
ReplyDeleteWell. Concerning time as a wave we think into the same direction. But one question: Might it be, that there is no difference between particles and waves? That they are just all the same, and we just sense some types of waves as particles and others not?
Another question. Must it be x(t) and (d/dt)x(t)=v(t)
and (d²/dt²)x(t)=a(t)?
or can it as well be something like:
[x(t(T)),y(t(T)),z(t(T)),t(T)]
With T being a vectorial "Supertime".
A btw, your theory with matter becoming antimatter is crap.
ReplyDeleteA black hole absorbs matter until a point of satisfaction and then blows out the vaporized matter out in form of pure energy.
That's the way new stars get born.
If you don't belief it, take a look trough the Hubble telescope into the middle of our galaxy where a super massive black hole is doing this crap all the time :-)
Open minds are sponges and equally a belief that one knows all simply because he or she has a single perspective is arrogant and small.
DeleteWell said.
Deletethe supermassive black hole at the center of our galaxy is inactive...only feeding stars release radiation...i know about the radiation..the matter to anti-matter idea is just a building block of thought for me..im going to add more ideas to these soon...but im sticking to my guns on most of the other stuff...
ReplyDeleteHypotheticals people. Anyone who says anything they disagree with is crap; needs to get a grip on science from a historical perspective. In that as we advance in technology; new theories replace outdated ones all the time. The arguments go back and forth every day. Stop trying to sound smart and maybe you will learn something.
ReplyDeleteFurthermore I can not view your blog. Why is that?
ReplyDeletenot sure why that is...might be your browser..this is blogspot..so might want to look into it...
ReplyDeleteive had issues with pop up blocker on blogspot..so might want to just turn it off to read this if you want.
very interesting.. :)
ReplyDeleteIf antimatter = "time waves" going back in time all the way to the birth of the universe, wouldn't that result in energy escaping the universe constantly? And when it reaches the beginning (that is if you even believe in the big bang theory :P), what happens to it? Does the antimatter just go past the moment of the bang or build up?
ReplyDeleteIt seems like a nice idea and all. It sort of explains how time and space are entangled, which is a thing I'm not sure I've ever really grasped with my mind. :P
But yeah, some nice ideas, and it's definitely important to go and think "outside the box" and seek for alternative answers to these "secrets". But just altogheter the black hole stuff wasn't that convincing to me, but I'm no physicist so...
i didnt say antimatter=time waves...i said the time wave pushes objects through space time in accordance with its mass...the reasoning for my belief that matter turns to antimatter when it enters a black hole...is in the idea of opposites....matter traveling forward=matter..matter traveling backwards=antimatter..also i thought that the reverse happends when the antimatter particles begin traveling forward in time again via reaching the big bang..which is in my view..is the biggest transformation of antimatter to matter ever...and is what the big bang really is
ReplyDeleteCheif i recently came up a similar understanding in my mind after watching someone perform the double slit experiment.
ReplyDeleteI think you are completely right about time being a wave, have you seen the bbc Horizon - 2010-2011 - What Is Reality this also says we are not the first to come to this realisation. I think the term holographic is possibly potentially a restrictive term to use for the explanation of mass's effect on time and something to try and not use, im glad you avoided it.
However in my model a black hole does not actually convert matter back to the beginning of the universe, nor does it convert to anti matter.
For a long time, maybe 10 years i came to the realisation, long before quantum mechanics had reached today's levels. That the observed gamma ray bursting from a black hole and hawkins prediction of its existence, was down to very very extreme maths which allows for the effect to happen at only very confined points above the poles of rotation. Think of the way we can observe a planets magneto sphere interacting with our sun radiation to create the rings of aurora. This due to the much lower energy involved its a much larger area and not exactly the same thing, but conceptually i found it help to understand what was going on.
Due to quantum entanglement when a particle travelling in a wave arrives in these very finite pole positions the extreme effects of both spin dynamics and the intraction of mass and space time or gravity if you will, are very distorted. But its potentially possible at the low points on the poles where at the point of the event horizon or electron would be on both sides of the event horizon we see our electrons escape as libirated energy, but this is like the slit experiment we only see the energy escaping relative to us, because we are observing it. In every single other point on the black hole this would result in the electron entering the black hole... HOWEVER at these pole points it was not the case and see they escape as energy. As someone said before at the end of the life of a black hole the stuff its eaten is given back as energy to create new stars and this is true, but i think this is a constant release into space time and not just a sudden release and fits with hawkins theory that black holes disappear into nothing. And explains that we only see the observable energy relative to ourselfs. No im not saying the energy is escaping from inside the black hole (might be..), just the effect its having on the matter/particles/electrons as its rotates around and hits the pole points. I wont say what i think is fully going on here as recently ive had a bit of potential re-think of the dynamics of this as i need to conceptualise for myself how fluid dynamics in my model can be applied to space time and quantum entanglement. Maybe you have some thoughts.
Regarding gravity, you said you believed that mass entering a black hole was causing the universe to constantly expand due to the loss of mass.
However, its not fully understood why gravity appears as the weakest of the forces, but what if our version of gravity was fundamentally flawed by our earlier lack of understanding for space time and quantum entanglement. I think possibly dark matter is a complete fudge and wrong and a model of gravity that describes an object in relation to space time and its wave and understand its not ever an object its self that is the provider of gravity and mealy the instigator as its mass interacts with space time.
Realising our model of gravity is fundamentally wrong and instead realise yes its responsible for the attractive force... but the force is imparted due to the interaction with space time.
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteAt points in the great expanse of the universe, places where black holes may have already eaten all matter and convert it energy or where not enough mass was present from the soup at the start of the universe. We see dark matter causing expansion, but using the common theme between our thinkings, the expansion is due to the lack of matter and space time and also as you said explains how an electron can be in more than one place and how when observer, only using a single point on the observers wave why it appears to then stop behaving as multiple particles.
ReplyDeletePersonally i fear using therms like dark matter, energy and holography it can cause a very narrow understanding and try to avoid them.
Im not sure as well that trying to use dimensions or brains or what ever to explain the differences between our observable world and what is really happening, as again it can create the wrong impression of going wrong, there is in fact no multiple dimensions as in as much as ours in not a dimension its just what were are able to observe of space time relative to our current point in the universe due to the interactions of our planet, solar system and ultimately our galaxy.
Take for example the data that's come back from the voyager probes of the last year or so.... this shows this and also how once away from the effects of our planet, and solar system and just under that of our galaxy things start to change.
Ok time to stop there, sorry im not saying your wrong or im right, just i came across your page and was somewhat shocked someone else has also postulated along similar lines.
Also one last though i know commonly we are taught that its impossible to apply fluid dynamics at a quantum level due to entanglement, this explains why and also says at the same time once you understand why and how our relative you have to ask yourself a few things more.
1. If the observed electron fails to behave like a wave on the slit experiment due to the point in space time used to observe, things like our map of the background radiation are made pretty useless, because we observed it.... think about, its like going on holiday and coming back and looking at the picture. Yes to you now it looks like that static shot, but due to what we are seeing is almost indefinitely distorted and can only due to its observation a representation from our view point and to give an example (although inexplicably wrong) its like seeing .000001 % of what's actually happening. The holiday picture is like remembering knowing there is stuff out of the shot of the picture and far more to the memory (you know there was more to reality) but the picture only lets you see that observable partial snapshot of a frozen point.
Regarding the search for the higgs particle, im not so sure we will find it. As what if when an electron exists in many places at once its the collective of all those places, be it the same point or not that gives mass as its the relative interactions with space time. When a black hole gives off gamma ray bursts this is electrons liberated that were observable to us and became observable energy.
I think this shows us possibly that when we once considered gravity a weak force it is actually not at all, just are we are only able to see the picture of the mass that is relative to us and the force currently understood as gravity is actually when viewed in such a way potentially much more powerful.
ReplyDeleteAnother though... is the energy created in a nuclear explosion representative of what we saw created it. If not does this also indicate that some how due to entanglement all or some more of energy from the non observable particles was released, did quantum entanglement break down and was it just a release of the observable liberated particle from the rest...?
And possibly is anti matter possibly just indication that at points its possible for and use again a bad example a higher or lower plane (there are no planes, just potentially infinate representations where some come close). What we are seeing is not anti matter it was just the interaction of just other non observable particles, the same particles we could observe just in another place. We couldnt see them twice but we could see the interactions the other locations causing a distrubance. However for this to happen the particles must be a similar freqency in space time, this only happens in extreme cases like in atom smashers, nuclear explosions and such like where due to an extreme event a short period of what is very close to parity is observed. Maybe there was parity but we could again never see it due to having to observe it, we could only see the interactions or harmonic particle space time frequency disturbance patterns, before its quickly settles back into a state of less or no parity. Maybe complete parity was not what happened only ever partial is what we observe or maybe are able to.
The quest for what gives matter should take into consideration that all particles we see are under the influence of quantum entanglement and we observe them retrospectively frozen in space time and unable to see their true nature, but if observation has shown us we might not be able to see something there but we can dam well see the interactions. So if there is interactions is it not possible that a particle gives its self matter through quantum entanglement and its the interactions of the particle with its self and others that gives rise to mass and not some other particle. Is in as much as there is no such thing as particle that gives other particles mass its more a case of the more that particle exists in locations that are closer and closer together the greater its mass. All particles interact with each other this is true of the one we can see and some of the ones we cant see the more of the ones we cant see are closer to the one that we can see means the interactions of those particles with other particles start to become collective. Think of a gas the faster it moves the more pressure it creates, as the particles entangled versions draw closer their harmonic to the observable one allows for theme to interact more with them self's and hence impart more of their own interactions with other non observable entangled versions onto other versions on them self.
Well there you go, that's my ramberlings done for the day.
I leave you for now with the words.
You (in extension Me/Everyone) only see what we want to....
... So think carefully about what you want to see.... ;)
Peace PLAzmA
Einstein integrated 1/2at2 basically formula in respect to get e=mc2. My third year in college I looked at the equation with respect to gravity and magnetism. After all gravity is a result of intermolecular attraction between atoms. I had one variable that kept popping up similar to the tau that develops in einsteins equation from which he conveniently lops off at the end of his equation. It's similar to a constant in einsteins equation but wasn't necessarily in mine. I thought there was one thing missing in his.
DeleteIf you are going through with this i suggest you document your research, just in case someone wishes to rob you of your discovery.
ReplyDeleteJust a little question. You mentioned dimensions beyond the 3rd opening up. Could this be related to the end of the Mayan Calender?
The prophecy circles around this:
"An Apocalypse (Greek: “lifting of the veil” or “revelation”) is a disclosure of something hidden from the majority of mankind in an era dominated by falsehood and misconception, i.e. the veil to be lifted." — Wikipedia
Lets say that a fourth dimension is to open up, and things that existed, invisible to mankind, were made visible.
Not to stray too far from the subject but it came to mind when reading your blog.
Good luck.
dont think anyone could rob me..its all documented here......thanks for your ideas on revelations to...i always try to match some of my thoughts to the bible...i actually found a link between my thoughts on the universe here, and god that proved he exists....but i totally forgot it the next day...i dont know how that happended..but mabye he doesnt want the secret out...ill try to remember it and post it as a blog
ReplyDeleteHow far do black holes compress this matter with anti matter? To what point? They must recombine the matter and reset the information that was giving order to these particles. So there must be some form of atomic DNA for lack of a better term that provides the basis for these particles to re-organize at some other point or quantum level. This "DNA" would have to be undestroyable to some extent all the way back to singularity.
ReplyDeleteWhat if the DNA is really just an encoding process. The keys to encode/decode could be prime numbers, pi and e (or one of the other infinite transcendental/irrational numbers we don't know about), The encoding/decoding function could be something like the Riemann Zeta function or some flavor of a Fourier Series? (a lot of the math in quantum physics use variations of Fourier series).
DeleteYou are phenomenal. I think that if this is correct, and it could very well be, that it will revolutionize our way of thinking, and will dawn a new era.
ReplyDeletemax riedl
ReplyDeletemr.rsproductions@gmail.com
Matter=antimatter^1
or M=A^1
by using plancks costant and this theary i deduce
that
X= (pC)^1/L+GM
x= time wave reversal.
G= graviational constant=6.67*10^-11 N*m^2/kg^2
pC=partical of light
L=messured result of Plancks constant=(h/p)=(h/mv)
Excellent theory, I am very impressed, out of all the studies i have done, nothing like this has ever crossed my mind, it gives us a new perspective on space and time and thats what we need to develop in science, a new perspective. If you are confident in your thoery...make it public, go big or go home. think about it.
ReplyDeleteall i can say is...... DAMN you guys are smart. Its very interesting, all of your theories. Im only 16 and this is all very interesting and i would love to get into this even more, i always hated math but just recently (last year) i began to like the challenge it brings and i would love to further my education in this field any suggestions as to how i can do this just email me at snuffleuffagus13@live.com yea i know its a weird email address please any more information as to how i can get into this or what your profession is would really help. THANKS :)
ReplyDeleteim trying to go big with this....but its hard to get attention
ReplyDeleteAnonymous 2,
ReplyDeleteYou really need to go to Dohgon University.com and try and get intouch with Professor Momoh. There is a contact form on hi page, even send him your link to your blogspot. He has the same wave/particle science explained and even has a formula for how the universe was created. I am not saying that you would agree with him, but you seem to be an inquiring mind and I think something great can come of such a contact.
exelente teoria no se si es la verdad pero se aproxima y bastante y por lo menos dejamos atras E=mc2, siempre crei que se podia estar compartiendo materia entre objetos, si nosotros creamos un universo al soñar, sin necesidad de materia, porque "dios" o la naturaleza no ahorra materia creando tiempos paralelos prestandose materia entre si.jejee como te llamas genio? saludos martin desde argentina
ReplyDeleteYou removed my comment? Why? If you want to be a real theorist, you have to take on-board peoples comments and work with them - not ignore them. You are a weak individual.
ReplyDeleteblack holes doesn't travel in the past. it is a real time moving station. once the big bang was created, it released all the pressure. now there is a vacuum pressure acting upon it. when the energy is all released, it forms a black hole which it sucks back all the energy it gave.
ReplyDeleteYour theory's certainly seem plausible, and i will be checking back to this post.
ReplyDeleteblack holes are real time moving...but that doesnt tell anyone what happend insite a black hole..my theory does
ReplyDeleteso if your moving an object from one location to another, are you shifting it's place in time? or just it's location at present.
ReplyDeleteyou would be shifting its present location...but the object would still exist in the past at its old location and also at other locations in the future
ReplyDeleteI made a strange theory about atoms to universe.
ReplyDeleteJust 4 fun.
Atoms with its electrons, Properties of the nucleus in the atoms, makes the potensial wave electrons. I belive gravity on a small scale inside the neucleus makes the potensial wave
electrons outside.The electrons is like a "ghost" particle which only can have potensial energy, it will never acrete matter to it, instead it directs the formation of molecules.
Planet is like a big atom, outside it has its electron (moon). The moon was first a potensial moon, a "ghost", because i belive gravity made the potensial moon, so it could acrete
matter to it.
Sun is like a huge atom, and our planets are its electrons, they of course also started as potensial planets aka "ghosts", before they acreted matter & gas to them. Gravity from
inside our sun made this possible.
Black hole is like an enormous atom, with its stars swirling arround it, all the stars was first "ghosts" which acreted matter & gas to them. The gravity inside the black hole made
all the information that of each "ghosts" outside its horizon. (for all i know galaxies can also be like huge molecules in space, if its so the time it takes for another galaxy to
crash into it and merge and produce a molecule is of course long, as it is with andromeda, which is 2 million light year apart from our milky way galaxy)
The universe is like a bubble, then the inside of that bubble in the beginning had gravity creating its "ghosts" as in white holes. Those white holes could spew out matter
for the rest of the universe to use. When they evaporated, black holes where created there instead, to build galaxies.
------------
By "ghost" i mean potensiality, Or like a blueprint with information (like a ghostparticle) on the object that can be built at that point, with stuff acreting to it cus of its gravity.
The blueprint is then allmost like a black hole in a way or something similar that has the right properties for its mission.
------------
This is so hard to explain!!
I belive gravity, as it pushes more and more on the core of either an atom, a planet, a sun, a black hole, it has nowhere to go, other than to create a potensial outside, cus
there is no room for it in the core. If it didnt create something outside it couldnt be a universe. But on the other hand there is something also inside like in atoms. And if
the planet created a moon inside the earth, or the sun created planets inside it etc, what good would it be for, we couldnt exist. :P
So there has to be something like this happening in the universe for it to have what it have. If it didnt have this. The universe would just build inside out which wouldnt work.
On the other hand, there is something inside and outside of things in the universe, we all know that. But there is a reason for why something has to be inside something and why
something has to be inside of something.
A moon will not have enough gravity to create a "ghost" outside it, so thats why we dont see moons with objects arround it.
The clue to understand how gravity can do this is the magnetic force, could incase of planets, be the bridge to make the "ghost" outside our planet.
There probably are forces in atoms sticking out to do the same for electrons. And same with black holes creating suns. And that can be the dark matter we dont see. The dark matter
can be like a magnetic field.
How the gravity do this with the help from the magnetic field is mindboggling, but im sure if its right it can be theorized.
imagine if we, transcend by inserting our consciousness into a computerized system.. think further into that.
ReplyDeleteadd me on fb.Nenad Mitrasinovic.
ReplyDeletehi, conserning bible,how could your theory explain the fact that elija and moses spoke with jesus,in real time continuum (disciples watching them), whilst the two men duelled in another space, jesus in between and the desciples in earths timespace ? It is a question that chases me since one decade now. My admiration for the quality of you spirit. Best regards, john of greece.
ReplyDeleteok i get what ur saying about how time is a wave and that time is determined by the speed of any objects mass and etc. but i thought one guy had a point.can this be in anyway shape or form as you explained that our universe has been growing for the past 4 billion years and etc.can this be related to the end of the myan calendar about the end of days and yada yada...
ReplyDeleteRead my article here:
ReplyDeletehttp://gfserbia.blogspot.com/2011/08/origin-of-life-and-structure-of.html
Hi guys i have a theory of the human soul
ReplyDeleteThey are like neutrinos we can't see them nor sense them but we can detect them if we find undiscovered similar to particles in magnetic fields. These undiscovered particles have something similar to dna that have information on them as well our memories etc.. I belive we can detect our souls like we found neutrinos
You are all retarded god created the universe and it is his will that you even exist, don't question powers that you don't understand. Read the bible sinners
ReplyDelete^ now whos the retard......i read the bible..and who said god just had to snap his finger and it WAS....how the fuck do you know what methods and how he created it jackwad......thats what science is for....and where in the bible does it say science is a sin....no, its the retarded church that brainwashes you to believe what they tell you...youre a puppet.now go hump a sheep
ReplyDeletecheck out the rope hypothesis from bill gaede u can search on you tube for him.I don't wanna cut your wings but for me only that part with dimensions sound good.Keep it up you r good
ReplyDeleteI pray for you as blasphemy is the greatest sin, the devil himself lays at the heart of all science,and it is you my son whom have been brain washed by the corrupted minds the others like yourself and on this forum. I bring only the salvation that Christ offers, the love he upholds for you and the forgiveness that awaits when you turn to him as said in Genesis 3:14 "Be kind to your sheep and goats, as they will soon realize their ways, their shame, their sin" God bless please do not use profanity towards an old priest of the Catholic Church
ReplyDeleteFather Carlito, religion has been played about with for years and years, people have finally come to terms with the fact that nobody actually knows what our purpose is. How you can still be 100% religious in this day and age is completely beyond me. You must have doubts anyway otherwise you wouldnt be on the site!
DeleteI love to postulate theories about the particle/wave duality, matter/antimatter relationship, and time/space continuum (including fun paradoxes).
ReplyDeleteI read a theory that sort of "redefined" the 2nd law of thermodynamics, enough so that it basically conflicted with the 1st law - it was the only way to try and describe the impossible miracle of WHY anything exists in the first place! I really wish I could find the website again, the conundrum was explained perfectly. As for me, it's still "chicken or the egg" - the whole creator/creation dilemma. In other words, says the 2nd law, if it has an END, it must have a BEGINNING. But what created the stuff so that the beginning of the universe/big bang/whatever could happen?
They now say that since matter didn't exist before the universe, neither did time or space...
So then if a particle can exist in two spaces at the same time, then two objects must be also able to occupy the same space at the same time I think, but that's impossible... but... I think all these theories are trying to describe to us that THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS TIME OR SPACE, that they really are illusions or holograms. And the observer is the one that decides the outcome of the particle/wave stuff... quantum mechanics can get spooky real quick.
Hawking mentions something about quantum particles (regular particle plus its anti-particle) that pop in and out of existence everywhere all of the time, yet doesn't say where the particles actually come FROM or go TO. So, there still has to be a place in "space" for it or the equivilent energy. Sometimes these duos pop in at the event horizon of a black hole, and one could get trapped while the other gets to survive in the universe without it's anti-particle.... which is something else I thought was impossible... Whatever.
Dude, have you read the theories on this one website called SuperRelativity.org ?
They're basically describing space as an actual physical thing, which I believe it is. I think time describes the situational changes that occur. Matter is, well, some kind of manifestation of energy over time. Then there's all that causality stuff...
Or something... anyways... the more you dig into any of these theories, right or wrong, it kinda doesn't matter because everything happens in a cycle..
But, the cycle is imperfect (2nd law of thermo.) and takes on a spiral pattern each time the cycle goes around. Do you see it? The downward spiral.
With enough energy, spirals can go up as well (phi, pi, creation of life, and other sacred geometry, etc.)
But it all eventually comes back down, down the spiral.
I'm still hoping that after the big cool down, and after all the matter in the universe has been transformed back into pure energy.... somehow that energy will be cunched down into the singularity for which the universe can be reborn, like it's been doing forever .. hahah I don't know. That's my "hope" theory.
It's like we're microbes in a test tube trying to decipher the reasons for why the scientist chose to wear blue or pink that day. Retarded. Let's try to figure out the simple things first, like how to sustain a clean, peaceful, and organic lifestyle on this planet.
Keep your minds open! Someone's got to figure out a little more of this puzzle sooner or later!
Hello,
ReplyDeleteYour theory makes since in ways but the diagram shown of the wavelengths makes your theory false, because there is a set distance to from the beginning to the end and it looks like if you were to straiten each line out it would come out to be the same distance. neither of any of those lines would be reaching a end quicker than the other. 2nd theory would be that the fastest at 16* the speed would be the longest verses the first line which would be the shortest and in which case these the lines would come to the end at the same time. One continuos motion and humans decide where to plot themselves on it.
I am just curious does a dark matter got suck on a black hole. it has a mass that interact with the ordinary matter that is responsible for the formation of our universe. and also our universe is inevitably going to end either on a big crunch or a big reap but most probably the big rip. in the Big rip theory the force of the dark energy is so strong that it will even rip atoms into its elementary particles.light from other galaxy cannot reach us since the speed of the expansion would reach the maximum speed limit ,the speed of light or speed of time as you call it. when the force of the dark energy is equivalent to that speed. time stops for that matter. Some theory said that some elementary particles e.g. neutrinos, tachyon travel faster than the speed of light or time warping on different space or time and doesn't interact with ordinary matter. so does it mean it wouldn't get sucked on a black hole... There is also a theory that all matter from our universe is the product of the matter winning the battle from an anti matter , a matter that interacts with a anti matter annihilate each other. from the beginning a set of laws physics where already written in every big bang or universe created. in some universe gravity is stronger or the other forces of the universe is different from our universe, in our universe gravity is 9.18 maybe in other universe it is greater resulting to the big crunch in its end or maybe in some universe anti matter is the common one.You said that "The wave of time pushes objects through timespace at speeds in accordance
ReplyDeletewith the objects mass" In the hadron collider when a particle is push to almost the speed of light about 1/3, the mass increase to about 7000 times so they have to increase the energy needed to push that particle maintain its speed. if the mass increases, does this mean that if the dark energy takes over and expand the universe to the force equal to the speed of light matter in the universe will also increase
update with my previous post about dark energy expanding the universe, as i have read some article in the super relativity theory speed of light a universal constant for speed, will increase as expansion of the universe increases.in this theory light with a characteristic of both particle and wave propagates on an invisible medium called "ether" like a sound wave propagate in air, water or metals medium. this ether is moving equal to speed of light so why the The Michelson-Morley Experiment failed to proved its existence. It also stated that the speed of light will continue to increase as expansion increases and the expansion speed of dark energy driving all matter away from each other can never be equal to the speed of light. so mass will not increase even though expansion from dark energy from some point of time reach the same speed of our current speed limit of 186,350 miles per second?
ReplyDeleteWow, I rode every single comment in that page and that's crazy! You guy's got the same interest as me to find the "true", but unfortunately it's over our comprehension. I think that even if there's others inteligent form of life in our universe everybody should have it's own theory.
ReplyDeleteThe only thing I'm sure is that we will not find the answer with bible...Bible is made for "weak" people who just can't handle they're just here, on earth for a couple of years and no more after... Yeah, that's hard to swallow (don't know if "hard to swallow" is well understandable (that's how I would say in French ^^)) but don't forget that 2000years before, people thought that multiple gods were carrying the sun, carrying the earth on it's shoulder and many others... So how can you just trust a simple "story"? :s
Anyway, we're not in a teological debate, I'm just sad for people who waste all they're life by trusting things that will probably be overpassed with time... Just have a look to the countries who spend they're life to pray god, do things god said, they're all ranked in the top ten of the poorest countries...
I don't know how many time you guy's are looking for the true of our universe but for me, that's make 9years and the last 2 years were full of depression because of what I could find on us... Why are we here if it's just a question of chance?The answer is simple: We're just here, like trees, water, planets, suns.... Don't look further ahahahaha.
So, if you guys are looking for theses theories from more than 9years, hmmmm you should be very bad in your own body isn't it? Are you as bad as me because of all these existential questions???
I think that people who trust all theses theories (like "théorie des cordes" cordes = ropes -> "ropes theory" ???) are very sensitive on what happening on earth nowadays... I mean, earthquakes, tsunamis, revolutions in many countries, solar winds wich become stronger and stronger... like mayas has predicted...
Yes, I saw on a post someone making the "rapprochement" beetween mayan calendar and a fourth dimension...
I'am agree with your theories, except the one with the black holes. But like you, I'm not a physist, I don't have the mathematical approach some people have but like you, a fews days before today I was thinking on what could I do of all my thinking about the differents theories I have about "space".
As you can see my english is not that good, and unfortunately I can't explain you my theories about things like other did on this same page.
Anyway, do you think we can have a contact together to talk about these things by "normal voice" because that's sooo interesting but soooo perturbating for the mental health ^^.
To finish I just want to tell you to continue on your way if you not come till a mental disease ahahah.
Si jamais des Français se connectent sur cette page mais ne prennent pas le temps de lire les précdents posts, eh bien je vous invite quand même à le faire lol car c'est trés interessant et j'imagine que si vous êtes tombés comme moi sur cette page c'est que vous vous interessez donc surement à tout ça, que vous êtes donc des personnes intelligentes et que vous prendrez donc le temps de lire tout ça ^^.
mail: floflorian54 at gmail dot com
http://www.facebook.com/groups/universescience/
ReplyDeleteWould be very nice to hear from you guys.
Jon.E.
Before I get going, I should point out I'm not a scientist either, just someone of reasonable intelligence and a creative imagination. I'm quite happy to be put in my place by 'proper scientists' ;).
ReplyDeleteSome of my own ideas draw parallels with yours - the black holes part was where it broke down a little for me though. Going back to the dawn of time just doesn't seem to add up for a few reasons - my theory was similar, but that black holes act as 'time anchors', forever stuck at a moment in time. Thereby still creating the antimatter effect you decribe, but not interfering with the beginning of time itself.
Recognising that the speed of light and the speed of time are two different things always seemed obvious to me, but many physics theories seem to refer to them as one and the same (at least as I understood them). Light speed has a duration within time, it isn't instantaneous, so going faster than light was always possible in my mind. The speed of time would by definition be instantaneous. Seeing the speed of time as the barrier for time flow, rather than the speed of light, makes perfect sense to me.
Seeing time as a process, or a finite wave helps to explain many things too - many of which you point out. It also eases the big bang theory in my mind too; it seems much easier to rationalise an expanding wave released from a singularity at the dawn of time rather than a physical universe.
The assertion that objects with smaller masses experience time relatively faster than objects with larger masses also rings true to my mind. And raises some interesting questions;
• if our universe exists within a wave, could other universes exist within waves in our universe. They could be infinitely small, existing in (to our observations) very short timeframes.
• if time itself has a speed, what is it travelling within? Is this higher dimension another universe in itself?
It's all very interesting. Thanks for an interesting read.
i do agree with you about some black holes being anchors but if you travel to the end of time some scientists believe in a big crunch as do i. so if you take that into acount, eventually all black holes will merge into 1 super black hole at the end of time (which i believe we are living in now since a black hole at its event horizon would have a flat time wave and time would stand still at that point) but taking that into acount. if all black holes merge at the end of time that means that the black holes created at the beginning of time would be there aswell. which would mean black holes will all eventually lead back to the big bang. much like water draining from multiple drains all eventually lead back to the sewer
ReplyDeleteI just love this mind blowing conversation. None of you have any access to any of the info you have been talking about here, or any kind of proof, so stop talking about something that has a 0.000000000000000000001 probability of being true. The theory is worth researching though. Don't give up. If you get a chance, try and prove it :)
ReplyDeleteI'v been in the balck hole in the beginning. Seen thousends of galaxes there were the start is. what I seen when I went in the black hole there around all the thousends galaxes, inside it totatly black. but like you say it have it all but nothings there but it all is there.
ReplyDeleteAnyway would like to discuss more abut this with (intelligent) "humans".
soatyou@hotmail.com
Take care and dont get fooled½
I think Bigger Waves from the future with Big Events might produce smaller Waves that are bigger than normal and Some people/animals/Things and us can sometimes pick up on that in Subliminal ways which at times makes us act strange or do unusual things!
ReplyDelete" Time is a Wave" it has tides, currents, eddy's, and swells. We exist within the earths surface time, which is subject to expansions and contractions in time due to the changes in the earths internal mass density. Satellites loose time at a greater rate the higher the orbit which make me believe earth's time wave radiates from the core like a pebble dropped on a still pond.
ReplyDeleteNow if a satellite was stationed directly over a an area of lower gravity from less mass (ie: N.E. Canada) it should loose time at a slower rate than other satellites hoovering over area's that are masses of higher density. Please be kind in your response I'm only a high school grad still interested in science.
What about Time from a conceptual perspective, like a tide moving in and out. Out from a central point, then moving back inward. As we expereicne past present and future all in the one moment. Time is only measured by change. so it's is interesting to pose a theroy on time, but time itself is a limited concept.
ReplyDeleteI think time is a wave, as everything acts like a wave, the problem is, what kind a wave. and how does this wave look like.2d 3d 4d and sofort, like a magentic wave, gravity wave, or entirely different wave.
ReplyDeletethat's the main question, we actually have all the answers. we only need to step off of our conservative thinking..... ;-)
A three dimensional wave with respect to x, y, z, and t or just x, y, and z. Substitute time in the equation for v=mgh then integrate it or the other way around ;). f(x)t= 1/2a(mgd)^2. I'm not going to give you all the answers. Einstein did it, do it similar to Einsteins equation but use mgd using substitution. D=distance traveled. The faster the acceleration the shorter the distance traveled.
DeleteTime cannot be a wave because, a wave is something that has got both a up and down or a compression and rarefraction. But time doesn't have anything like that.it doesn't Dall down after any time. It just flows like a big line!
ReplyDeleteAnd instead of considering time wave to be dependent on mass, why not think of the weight? It's proven that time changes with both relative velocity and gravity. So as relative velocity increases the mass increases and even weight increases and as gravity increases, the weight increases. So why not consider time to be dependant on weight?
ReplyDeleteAm not a physicist!
Do you need Personal Loan?
ReplyDeleteBusiness Cash Loan?
Unsecured Loan
Fast and Simple Loan?
Quick Application Process?
Approvals within 24-72 Hours?
No Hidden Fees Loan?
Funding in less than 1 Week?
Get unsecured working capital?
Contact Us At :majidvijahlending@gmail.com
LOAN SERVICES AVAILABLE INCLUDE:
================================
*Commercial Loans.
*Personal Loans.
*Business Loans.
*Investments Loans.
*Development Loans.
*Acquisition Loans .
*Construction loans.
*Business Loans And many More:
LOAN APPLICATION FORM:
=================
Full Name:................
Loan Amount Needed:.
Purpose of loan:.......
Loan Duration:..
Gender:.............
Marital status:....
Location:..........
Home Address:..
City:............
Country:......
Phone:..........
Mobile / Cell:....
Occupation:......
Monthly Income:....
Contact Us At :majidvijahlending@gmail.com
Ah. For those who cannot see. Do not.
ReplyDeleteYes...I agree... Time IS a wave...I just had the same thought..and the reason it lead me to this article...Also, you have a bunch of other thoughts I agree with...very interesting
ReplyDeleteIMHO time is not a one wave is a multiple waves move back. and for.
ReplyDeletetwo point of reflection, black hole originated and black hole mirror.
I almost forgot em wave spreads over space and time (past and future)
ReplyDelete